Abouts:
Officially typing with one hand now, anesthesia is not fun

There is probably other stuff I wanted to write, but with everything happening around me right now there isn’t much time

Ready to go home, hope driving with one hand is not illegal

If you didn’t notice Prodigal Jon left a comment…

Articles:
Mark Dever on the Five Points of Criticism, we know how to be critics, we know how to tell people what they are doing wrong, but do we know how to do it in a God glorifying manner

Ask People How You Can Pray for Them

Another person’s interpretation of what the calling of a pastor should look like

Audios:
I guess I am in my folk/chick music phase right now, Priscilla Ahn

Randoms:
Resolved 2008, same speakers as last year plus… Randy Alcorn

Desiring God is having an advent sale, where they will have an item per week for sale, last week was the book Battling Unbelief, and this week is the DVD package, Brothers—Feel, Think, Preach God 

Readings:
Taken from Pure Church:

“What the world dismisses as sheer foolishness, the foolishness of God, proves ‘wiser than man’s wisdom’ (1 Cor. 1:25). What the world writes off as hopeless weakness, the weakness of God, proves ‘stronger than man’s strength’ (1:25). This is much more radical than saying that God has more wisdom than human beings, or that he is stronger than human beings–as if we are dealing with mere degrees of wisdom and power. Now, we are dealing with polar opposites. Human ‘wisdom’ and ‘strength’ are, from God’s perspective, rebellious folly and moral weakness. And the moment when God most dramatically discloses his own wisdom and strength, the moment when his own dear Son is crucified–although it is laughed out of court by the tawdry ‘wisdom’ of this rebellious world, by the pathetic ‘strength’ of the self-deceived–is nevertheless the moment of divine wisdom and divine power. ‘For the foolishness of God is wiser than man’s wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man’s strength’ (1:25).
“For those of us in any form of Christian ministry, this lesson must constantly be reappropriated. Western evangelicalism tends to run through cycles of fads. At the moment, books are pouring off the presses telling us how to plan for success, how ‘vision’ consists in clearly articulating ‘ministry goals,’ how the knowledge of detailed profiles of our communities constitutes the keys to successful outreach. I am not for a moment suggesting that there is nothing to be learned from such studies. But after a while one may perhaps be excused for marveling how many churches were planted by Paul and Whitefield and Wesley and Stanway and Judson without enjoying these advantages. Of course all of us need to understand the people to whom we minister, and all of us can benefit from small doses of such literature. But massive doses sooner or later dilute the gospel. Ever so subtly, we start to think that success more critically depends on thoughtful sociological analysis than on the gospel; Barna becomes more important than the Bible. We depend on plans, programs, vision statements–but somewhere along the way we have succumbed to the temptation to displace the foolishness of the cross with the wisdom of strategic planning. Again, I insist, my position is not a thinly veiled plea for obscurantism, for seat-of-the-pants ministry that plans nothing. Rather, I fear that the cross, without ever being disowned, is constantly in danger of being dismissed from the central place it must enjoy, by relatively peripheral insights that take on far too much weight. Whenever the periphery is in danger of displacing the center, we are not far removed from idolatry.”

From D.A. Carson, The Cross and Christian Ministry: Leadership Lessons from 1 Corinthians (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, pp. 25-26).

Videos:

Verses:
Ecclesiastes 4:7-12
Again, I saw vanity under the sun: one person who has no other, either son or brother, yet there is no end to all his toil, and his eyes are never satisfied with riches, so that he never asks, “For whom am I toiling and depriving myself of pleasure?” This also is vanity and an unhappy business.
Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow. But woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up! Again, if two lie together, they keep warm, but how can one keep warm alone? And though a man might prevail against one who is alone, two will withstand him—a threefold cord is not quickly broken.

This week is “meditate and come up with your own thought for the passage” week

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: